i agree, i am just a FIAT OWNERazruss wrote:thanks for the good laugh, guys. Surprised anyone had the balls to stick their toe into this fire pit.
My guess is that 50% of the stuff posted have spelling or grammatical errors.....including my posts.
In my 50+ years of working various jobs and owning several businesses, i have come to the following conclusion. Command of the english language is not a good indicator of intelligence, street smarts, work ability, education, or trustworthiness.
it is all good on my end124cso wrote:It was not my intention to be harsh or condecending and I know that most of us (older members at least) are not trained at using keyboards. I type 2 fingered and think i'm doing well if a 3rd gets a shot at something from time to time.
All i was trying to say was that the lead thread message was not that clear, to me anyway. I worked it out, or guessed what he meant at about the third reading
"engine bay OFF THE CARB there was on there Was that there was none there ? or was there one there ? i looked under the car just a quick look and in the truck off the tank and seen none " Ok Ok, in the trunk next to the tank ? but not glaringly plain
I do try and proof my posts but I suspect that some others do not think they need to..? And it is not only in this forum.
124cso wrote:It was not my intention to be harsh or condecending and I know that most of us (older members at least) are not trained at using keyboards. I type 2 fingered and think i'm doing well if a 3rd gets a shot at something from time to time.
All i was trying to say was that the lead thread message was not that clear, to me anyway. I worked it out, or guessed what he meant at about the third reading
"engine bay OFF THE CARB there was on there Was that there was none there ? or was there one there ? i looked under the car just a quick look and in the truck off the tank and seen none " Ok Ok, in the trunk next to the tank ? but not glaringly plain
I do try and proof my posts but I suspect that some others do not think they need to..? And it is not only in this forum.
maytag wrote:124cso wrote:It was not my intention to be harsh or condecending and I know that most of us (older members at least) are not trained at using keyboards. I type 2 fingered and think i'm doing well if a 3rd gets a shot at something from time to time.
All i was trying to say was that the lead thread message was not that clear, to me anyway. I worked it out, or guessed what he meant at about the third reading
"engine bay OFF THE CARB there was on there Was that there was none there ? or was there one there ? i looked under the car just a quick look and in the truck off the tank and seen none " Ok Ok, in the trunk next to the tank ? but not glaringly plain
I do try and proof my posts but I suspect that some others do not think they need to..? And it is not only in this forum.
i think we're all good.
i get a kick out of when some one corrects others SPELLING they best not have a mistake lol. but on the seriouse side, i can't spell and i really don't give a damn in who says something about it,or corrects me , be aware i a a smart azz and i will BE BACK lol
text is not the greatest way to communicate, because so many nuances get missed. And you're right: there are some (more on other forums) who never seem to care how their posts read. I find it interesting when someone posts a question that they want help with, but they've only got 3 posts and you can't read any of them because they are so badly formatted or spell-checked. I think they show disrespect to the people who will spend time to respond anyway.
However: in Jim's case, and others here and elsewhere, we discover that sometimes it's not a question of uncaring, or disrespect. We're all good a different stuff.
, we can move on to the viberation post, see u therehahah, oh thats ok, lol// so did u figure out that my engine is 2.O OR WHATBEEK wrote:I would look like a babbling idiot if I didn’t have the grasp of spell check
does not have a very good top out in speed,105? does that sound about rightBEEK wrote:yes a 2.0