3.90 OR 4.30 REAR END
- 81SPIDERMATT
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:10 pm
- Your car is a: 1981 spider 2000
- Location: FORT COLLINS, CO
3.90 OR 4.30 REAR END
81 Spider. Blew up my rear diff and have the option of staying 3.90 or going 4.30 . I am leaning to the 4.30 as most of my travels are mountain driving and seldom hit the highway. what say the braintrust??
I know that the 4.30 rear end will need drive shaft replacement, shock mounts are different but I can use the same shocks, not sure about the panhard bar or the short trailing arms ? I think the long ones are the same
anything else needed for the 4.30 rear end swap? thanks as always for any advise or tips... Matt
I know that the 4.30 rear end will need drive shaft replacement, shock mounts are different but I can use the same shocks, not sure about the panhard bar or the short trailing arms ? I think the long ones are the same
anything else needed for the 4.30 rear end swap? thanks as always for any advise or tips... Matt
- nelsonj
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 5:37 pm
- Your car is a: 1972 Spider 124
Re: 3.90 OR 4.30 REAR END
If I ever had the choice, I'm going with a 3.9. My engine revs too high at freeway (plus) speeds and I would really like to drop that high end down. The ideal solution is the 4.3 with a lowered 5th gear ratio - but good luck making that happen.
Peace.
Out.
Peace.
Out.
Simi Valley, California
Spider 1800
Romans 10:9
- RRoller123
- Patron 2020
- Posts: 8179
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 2:04 pm
- Your car is a: 1980 FI SPIDER 2000
- Location: SAGAMORE BEACH, MA USA
Re: 3.90 OR 4.30 REAR END
I think 5th is much too low on these cars (on my '80 anyway) and the engine revs way too high on the highway. And first is too low as well, it barely gets the car moving. It is a funny collection of gearing. I think I could use only 2,3 and 4 and just forget 1 and 5 and most driving would be fine. Hahahah! I would go for the taller diff.
'80 FI Spider 2000
'74 and '79 X1/9 (past)
'75 BMW R75/6
2011 Chevy Malibu (daily driver)
2010 Chevy Silverado 2500HD Ext Cab 4WD/STD BED
2002 Edgewater 175CC 80HP 4-Stroke Yamaha
2003 Jaguar XK8
2003 Jaguar XKR
2021 Jayco 22RB
2019 Bianchi Torino Bicycle
'74 and '79 X1/9 (past)
'75 BMW R75/6
2011 Chevy Malibu (daily driver)
2010 Chevy Silverado 2500HD Ext Cab 4WD/STD BED
2002 Edgewater 175CC 80HP 4-Stroke Yamaha
2003 Jaguar XK8
2003 Jaguar XKR
2021 Jayco 22RB
2019 Bianchi Torino Bicycle
-
- Posts: 550
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 7:45 am
- Your car is a: 1982 Spider 2000
- Location: Arvada, Colorado
Re: 3.90 OR 4.30 REAR END
I would find one of those calculators on line to see what the difference in rev's is at your desired road speeds. Might be a lot of work for a couple hundred RPM. I've been happy with the 3.90 ('82 FI).
Kirk
Kirk
- 81SPIDERMATT
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:10 pm
- Your car is a: 1981 spider 2000
- Location: FORT COLLINS, CO
Re: 3.90 OR 4.30 REAR END
4.3 was the final decision .... could not be happier ... ripping the mountain roads is where it really shines ....Matt
- phaetn
- Patron 2018
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 7:42 pm
- Your car is a: 1974 Fiat Spider 1800
- Location: Ottawa, ON Canada
Re: 3.90 OR 4.30 REAR END
Do you mind if I ask where you sourced it?
I am looking to replace my 4.3 diff and avoid going to 3.9 which is what most vendors offer. I am intrigued that you had another option.
Cheers,
phaetn
I am looking to replace my 4.3 diff and avoid going to 3.9 which is what most vendors offer. I am intrigued that you had another option.
Cheers,
phaetn
- aevansgatech
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 2:51 pm
- Your car is a: 1982 Spider 2000
Re: 3.90 OR 4.30 REAR END
Any pre-conditions to the original diff going?
1979 Spider 2000 (gone)
1984 Pininfarina Azzurra (for sale)
1982 Spider 2000 (here to stay)
1984 Pininfarina Azzurra (for sale)
1982 Spider 2000 (here to stay)
- 81SPIDERMATT
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:10 pm
- Your car is a: 1981 spider 2000
- Location: FORT COLLINS, CO
Re: 3.90 OR 4.30 REAR END
aevansgatech wrote:Any pre-conditions to the original diff going?
sliding down the dirt back roads on to pavement is what I am sure had something to do with it .... age ... mileage .... driving style .... but the mechanic buddy that cracked her open said it was on of the worst damage he had seen
phaetn ... pm responded to
- aevansgatech
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 2:51 pm
- Your car is a: 1982 Spider 2000
Re: 3.90 OR 4.30 REAR END
81SPIDERMATT wrote:aevansgatech wrote:Any pre-conditions to the original diff going?
sliding down the dirt back roads on to pavement is what I am sure had something to do with it .... age ... mileage .... driving style .... but the mechanic buddy that cracked her open said it was on of the worst damage he had seen
phaetn ... pm responded to
Not sure if I should say sorry or congratulations.... sounds like you have fun with it
1979 Spider 2000 (gone)
1984 Pininfarina Azzurra (for sale)
1982 Spider 2000 (here to stay)
1984 Pininfarina Azzurra (for sale)
1982 Spider 2000 (here to stay)
- phaetn
- Patron 2018
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 7:42 pm
- Your car is a: 1974 Fiat Spider 1800
- Location: Ottawa, ON Canada
Re: 3.90 OR 4.30 REAR END
Now that the car is back on the road after having the head machined and valve seats cut I can do a test run on the highway.
Going 100km/h (62.5mph) in 4th gear I was pulling 3900rpm. I guess given that it's not overdrive then that means that I have a 3.9 diff rather than the 4.30:1 that originally came with the car. Yet I don't have the split case, but the older style.
I guess that means the p.o. put in a new pinion and ring gear. Would everything still fit the same way in an old case?
Cheers,
phaetn
Going 100km/h (62.5mph) in 4th gear I was pulling 3900rpm. I guess given that it's not overdrive then that means that I have a 3.9 diff rather than the 4.30:1 that originally came with the car. Yet I don't have the split case, but the older style.
I guess that means the p.o. put in a new pinion and ring gear. Would everything still fit the same way in an old case?
Cheers,
phaetn
- 81SPIDERMATT
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:10 pm
- Your car is a: 1981 spider 2000
- Location: FORT COLLINS, CO
Re: 3.90 OR 4.30 REAR END
I have no idea .. I will pay attention to rpms and speeds tomorrow and get back to you ... Matt
- aj81spider
- Patron 2020
- Posts: 1526
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:04 am
- Your car is a: 1974 Fiat 124 Spider
- Location: Chelmsford, MA
Re: 3.90 OR 4.30 REAR END
3900 RPM at 100 kph doesn't necessarily mean you have a 3.9 rear end. It depends on the size of your tires.
An example: 205/50-15 tires have a circumference of 72.8 inches.
At 62.5 mph you are traveling 66,000 inches per minute.
66,000/72.8 is 906.6
906.6 x 4.3 is 3898 rpm or almost exactly the 3900 you are seeing.
I don't know what size tires you are running, but you could certainly see 3900 rpm at 100 kph with a 4.3 differential.
An example: 205/50-15 tires have a circumference of 72.8 inches.
At 62.5 mph you are traveling 66,000 inches per minute.
66,000/72.8 is 906.6
906.6 x 4.3 is 3898 rpm or almost exactly the 3900 you are seeing.
I don't know what size tires you are running, but you could certainly see 3900 rpm at 100 kph with a 4.3 differential.
A.J.
1974 Fiat 124 Spider
2006 Corvette
1981 Spider 2000 (sold 2013 - never should have sold that car)
1974 Fiat 124 Spider
2006 Corvette
1981 Spider 2000 (sold 2013 - never should have sold that car)
- 81SPIDERMATT
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:10 pm
- Your car is a: 1981 spider 2000
- Location: FORT COLLINS, CO
Re: 3.90 OR 4.30 REAR END
60 mph turning 3900 rpms ... 14 inch tires .. 4th gear ....Matt
- phaetn
- Patron 2018
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 7:42 pm
- Your car is a: 1974 Fiat Spider 1800
- Location: Ottawa, ON Canada
Re: 3.90 OR 4.30 REAR END
Thanks, gents.
Good point, aj81spider. Doh! I had forgotten about my tires. I used to run 185/70-13s and now have 205/50-15s. According to TireSize Calculator the bigger tires are almost a half percent smaller in dia. and circum. (-0.4%), though I know tires can actually vary by manufacturing batch.
You're right on. I'm still 4.3. Trust the math. Jeez, I'm an epistemology teacher, I should know this... Sometimes my brain gets clouded by the allure of buying new Fiat bits.
Cheers,
phaetn
Good point, aj81spider. Doh! I had forgotten about my tires. I used to run 185/70-13s and now have 205/50-15s. According to TireSize Calculator the bigger tires are almost a half percent smaller in dia. and circum. (-0.4%), though I know tires can actually vary by manufacturing batch.
You're right on. I'm still 4.3. Trust the math. Jeez, I'm an epistemology teacher, I should know this... Sometimes my brain gets clouded by the allure of buying new Fiat bits.
Cheers,
phaetn
- 81SPIDERMATT
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:10 pm
- Your car is a: 1981 spider 2000
- Location: FORT COLLINS, CO
Re: 3.90 OR 4.30 REAR END
[quote Not sure if I should say sorry or congratulations.... sounds like you have fun with it [/quote]
haha ... don't know how I missed this comment... yes I do have quite a bit of fun ... Matt
haha ... don't know how I missed this comment... yes I do have quite a bit of fun ... Matt