from your pic, right now you have a pretty much perfect suspension geometry. upper edge of lower suspension arm sitting paralel to the ground.
however, that's not how your car left the factory. people go to great lenghts to lower their 124's and you have the opposite, yet common problem. springs get soft over the years, and twincam is definately heavier than old ohv.
now, you're in for a bit of experimenting that involves several front springs swaps if you don't get it right the first time around.
my sugestion would be to get a pair of new front springs for lada. cheap as chips, ride height about 20mm higher than original 124 1200 ohv. however, lada engine is considerably heavier then fiats 1200ohv, with fiat twincam, they're just about right if you chop off one circle from them.
you can also get a pair of used springs from an US spec 124 spider. they weigh about the same, already has a twincam, and they sit pretty high to begin with.
my 1979 lada 2103
front springs are lada OEM shotrened by one circle
rear springs used OEM off a 35yr old fiat 132
tyre size 185/60/13
the ride is soft, excellent bump absorption, yet not unpleasant as contemporary 70's american cars. combined with OEM two way oil filled shocks and 20mm OEM sway bar, there's no excessive body roll
if you decide to go for spider front springs, grab a sway bar also. late year 2lts spiders hould have thicker sway bar then yours
also, bad roads being common problem of eastern europe, sump guards are available, bolt on to lada, and i suspect also bolt on to yours 124. i have one on my car, and a spare at the workshop. i'll dig it up and take pics
is your twincam 1.6, 1.8 or 2 liter? 1.6 and 1.8 have shalow sump that sits about the same heignt as lower edge of crossmember, and 2 liter dips about 12mm lower, leaving it very exposed.
ruskies solved this issue by making the lada sump out of 1.5mm sheet metal, instead of italian 0.8
unfortunately it doesn't fit fiat engines...